D.C. Circuit· 10/16/1978
Lamont v. Haig
Citations
- 590 F.2d 1124
- 192 U.S. App. D.C. 8
- 48 A.L.R. Fed. 418
- 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8420
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]f suit is sought to be maintained not only against a federal defendant embraced within Section 1391(e) but also against an additional person, there must be proper venue as specified in the 16 pertinent statutes as to each.” (citation modified)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Darby v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict of Columbia· 2002-11-04· cited 151×
- Wultz v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 2010-10-20· cited 104×
- James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.District of Columbia· 2002-07-31· cited 90×
- James v. VERIZON SERVICES CORP.District of Columbia· 2009-08-03· cited 82×
- Davis v. Costa-GavrasS.D. New York· 1984-02-07· cited 80×
- Burnett v. Al Baraka Investment & Development Corp.District of Columbia· 2003-07-25· cited 71×
- Bourdon v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2017-02-16· cited 62×
- McLaughlin v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2012-05-25· cited 34×
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2011-12-06· cited 28×
- PKWare, Inc. v. MeadeE.D. Wisconsin· 2000-01-07· cited 26×
- AJ Taft Coal Co., Inc. v. BarnhartN.D. Alabama· 2003-11-14· cited 25×
- Green v. North Arundel Hospital Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-26· cited 23×
- Coltrane v. LappinDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-15· cited 22×
- Herbert v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-25· cited 21×
- Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. v. BivinsDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-19· cited 20×
- Jones v. PanettaDistrict of Columbia· 2013-07-30· cited 15×
- Villa v. SalazarDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-28· cited 11×
- Validus Reinsurance, Ltd. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2015-05-26· cited 11×
- Perlmutter v. VaroneDistrict of Columbia· 2014-07-22· cited 10×
- Corbett v. JenniferDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-29· cited 9×
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,362×
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1976-10-20· cited 360×
- Jones v. BalesN.D. Georgia· 1972-07-13· cited 246×
- Baddock v. American Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1977-05-02· cited 244×
- Schlanger v. SeamansSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 214×
- Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 171×
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1948-06-21· cited 146×
- Lamont v. HaigD.C. Circuit· 1978-10-16· cited 128×
- Smith v. LyonSupreme Court· 1890-02-03· cited 119×
- Powelton Civic Home Owners Ass'n Ex Rel. Hilburn Harbidge v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentE.D. Pennsylvania· 1968-04-22· cited 114×
- Honda Associates, Inc. v. Nozawa Trading, Inc.S.D. New York· 1974-04-16· cited 106×
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1968-08-09· cited 104×
- Gardner Engineering Corporation v. Page Engineering CompanyEighth Circuit· 1973-08-01· cited 89×
- Dredge Corp. v. PennyNinth Circuit· 1964-11-13· cited 88×
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers of the U. S. ARMYE.D. Arkansas· 1971-01-21· cited 84×
- Arlo Tatum, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1971-04-27· cited 83×
- Ghazoul v. International Management Services, Inc.S.D. New York· 1975-07-25· cited 77×
- Tefal, S.A. And Royal Chambord, Inc. v. Products International Company, a Partnership Also Known as Picam Products and as Prescott Adams & NolanThird Circuit· 1976-01-26· cited 74×
- James R. Nestor v. Lewis B. HersheyD.C. Circuit· 1969-12-16· cited 70×
- Relf v. GaschD.C. Circuit· 1975-04-03· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.