Ninth Circuit· 10/8/1999

Lambright v. Stewart

Citations

191 F.3d 1181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the use of a dual jury procedure did not violate the defendants‟ due process rights in a capital murder trial
noting that Idaho statute requires courts to weigh each aggravating factor against all mitigating factors
finding no violation of due process or any other trial right in the use of dual juries in a capital case
finding no violation of due process or any other trial right in the use of dual juries in a capital case
upholding use where there was no due process violation and neither defendant “convincingly pointed to some other specific trial right which was compromised”
dual juries are permissible in capital cases so long as they comport with Due Process; denial of a motion to sever for antagonistic defenses not reversible without a showing of clear prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Fernandez, Graber, Hug, Kozinski, Law, Nelson, Reinhardt, Scannlain, Schroeder, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.