Seventh Circuit· 3/18/2004

In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation

Citations

361 F.3d 439
57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1101
63 Fed. R. Serv. 1297
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5090
2004 WL 527033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that separate juries could be used to try co-conspirators in a civil trial because while separate juries “may render different verdicts, which may be inconsistent,” the inconsistency would be the permissi- ble result of the juries hearing different evidence
court has inherent authority to sever claims in interest of justice even when standard under Rule 21 is not satisfied
court has inherent authority to separate claims in interest of justice even when standard under Rule 21 is not satisfied
court has inherent authority to sever claims in interest of justice even when standard under Rule 21 is not satisfied
court has inherent authority to sever claims in interest of justice even when standard under Rule 21 is not satisfied
court has inherent authority to sever claims in interest of justice even when standard under Rule 21 is not satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.