Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/18/1987
Lambert v. Stovell
Citations
- 205 Conn. 1
- 529 A.2d 710
- 1987 Conn. LEXIS 989
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claim accrued when plaintiff was “aware of circumstances indicating that he had suffered a form of ‘actionable harm’ and should have discovered his injury at that time”
- general denial of complaint and statute of limitations defense causes general verdict for defendant to be reasonably rendered on one or more distinct grounds
- \[t]he three year provision of § 52-577 is applicable to all tort actions other than those excepted therefrom by § 52-584 or other sections\
- in negligence actions brought under Connecticut law, “injury” means actionable harm for statute of limitations purposes
- Accrual of medical malpractice action occurs on discovery of some form of actionable harm, not on discovery of applicable legal theories.
- because claim was “based upon a lack of informed consent and not an absence of consent,” it was not a battery claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Santaniello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.Second Circuit· 1996-02-21· cited 314×
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-16· cited 260×
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-08· cited 232×
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-04-06· cited 128×
- Mountaindale Condominium Ass'n v. ZapponeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-15· cited 54×
- Merly v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-16· cited 48×
- Culbertson v. MernitzIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-10-29· cited 45×
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-04· cited 44×
- Pedersen v. VahidySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-01-03· cited 43×
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,275 Terry Gnazzo v. G.D. Searle & Co.Second Circuit· 1992-08-21· cited 39×
- Caron v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-03-08· cited 35×
- In Re State Police LitigationD. Connecticut· 1995-05-16· cited 32×
- Gemme v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-06-01· cited 26×
- Shortell v. CavanaghSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-03-15· cited 20×
- Duffy v. FlaggSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-29· cited 17×
- Gallinari v. KlothD. Connecticut· 2015-12-01· cited 15×
- George v. CarusoneD. Connecticut· 1994-03-24· cited 13×
- Tarnowsky v. SocciConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-18· cited 8×
- Lombard v. Edward J. Peters, Jr., P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-09· cited 7×
- SANDSTROM ON BEHALF OF SANDSTROM v. Chemlawn Corp.D. Connecticut· 1991-03-14· cited 4×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-03-13· cited 507×
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateD.C. Circuit· 1972-07-20· cited 455×
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-10-27· cited 393×
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-12· cited 354×
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-27· cited 261×
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-06· cited 171×
- United Aircraft Corp. v. International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-04-13· cited 74×
- Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-02-27· cited 47×
- Stone v. BastaracheSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-24· cited 39×
- Colucci v. PinetteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-11-17· cited 34×
- LaFleur v. Farmington River Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-06-08· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.