Skip to main content

Lambert v. State

Citations

  • 2005 OK CR 26
  • 126 P.3d 646
  • 2005 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 20
  • 2005 WL 3334753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Mental retardation and mental illness are separate issues. It is possible to be mentally retarded and mentally ill.”
  • “[T]he State - 140 - need not present any evidence that a capital defendant can function in areas other than those in which a deficit is claimed.”
  • “Unless a defendant’s evidence of particular limitations is specifically contradicted by evidence that he does not have those limitations, then the defendant’s burden is met no matter what evidence the State might offer that he has no deficits in other skill areas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapel, Vice-Presiding, Johnson, Lewis, Lumpkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.