Nebraska Court of Appeals· 10/3/2000
Lambert v. Lambert
Citations
- 617 N.W.2d 645
- 9 Neb. Ct. App. 661
- 2000 Neb. App. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- petition for modification or termination of alimony will be denied if change in financial condition is due to fault or voluntary wastage or dissipation of one’s talents and assets
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irwin, Sievers, Carlson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grahovac v. GrahovacNebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-06-08· cited 15×
- Murphy v. MurphyNebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-12-02· cited 5×
- State Ex Rel. Hannon v. RosenbergNebraska Court of Appeals· 2002-12-24· cited 3×
- State Ex Rel. Longnecker v. LongneckerNebraska Court of Appeals· 2003-05-06· cited 3×
- Hodgen v. HodgenNebraska Court of Appeals· 2022-01-11· cited 3×
- Troester v. TroesterNebraska Court of Appeals· 2019-04-23
- Harper v. HarperNebraska Court of Appeals· 2021-04-20
- Smith v. McCrightNebraska Court of Appeals· 2022-06-21
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ohler v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 75×
- Pope v. PopeNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-02-14· cited 42×
- Morisch v. MorischNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-10-05· cited 19×
- Lodden v. LoddenNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-19· cited 14×
- Becker v. BeckerNebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-12-16· cited 10×
- Mace v. MaceNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-05-16· cited 10×
- Dormann v. DormannNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-02-22· cited 8×
- Portland v. PortlandNebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-01-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.