Hodgen v. Hodgen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding violation of not making child support and alimony payments was not willful because of financial uncertainty surrounding job loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. McCright
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2022-06-21
• Essink v. Essink
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2022-08-02

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hotz v. Hotz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-09-21· cited 299×
• Trieweiler Ex Rel. Varsity Investments, Inc. v. Sears
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2004-12-17· cited 146×
• Fetherkile v. Fetherkile
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-02-23· cited 69×
• Tilson v. Tilson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2020-09-25· cited 45×
• Pope v. Pope
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-02-14· cited 42×
• Richardson v. Anderson
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-01-11· cited 33×
• Voichoskie v. Voichoskie
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1983-11-28· cited 22×
• Marr v. Marr
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-04-22· cited 22×
• Grahovac v. Grahovac
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-06-08· cited 15×
• Voichoskie v. Voichoskie
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-04-05· cited 13×
• Lambert v. Lambert
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-10-03· cited 12×
• Murphy v. Murphy
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-12-02· cited 5×