Skip to main content
· 5/7/1966

Laird & Company v. Cheney

Citations

  • 414 P.2d 18
  • 196 Kan. 675
  • 1966 Kan. LEXIS 333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following Tri-State to hold that liquor price-fixing law did not violate the police power because \the method used is reasonable and not arbitrary and ... there is a real and substantial relation to a proper legislative purpose\
  • following Tri-State to hold that liquor price-fixing law did not violate the police power because \the method used is reasonable and not arbitrary and . . . there is a real and substantial relation to a proper legislative purpose\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harman, Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.