· 5/7/1966
Laird & Company v. Cheney
Citations
- 414 P.2d 18
- 196 Kan. 675
- 1966 Kan. LEXIS 333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- following Tri-State to hold that liquor price-fixing law did not violate the police power because \the method used is reasonable and not arbitrary and ... there is a real and substantial relation to a proper legislative purpose\
- following Tri-State to hold that liquor price-fixing law did not violate the police power because \the method used is reasonable and not arbitrary and . . . there is a real and substantial relation to a proper legislative purpose\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harman, Fromme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.