Skip to main content

Lagenour v. State

Citations

  • 376 N.E.2d 475
  • 268 Ind. 441
  • 1978 Ind. LEXIS 687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • differentiating motions in limine, which seek to prevent potentially prejudicial matter from being presented to a jury until the trial court can rule upon its admissibility in the context of the trial, and motions to suppress, which seek to absolutely prohibit use of certain evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Givan, Hunter, Prentice, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lagenour v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.