Skip to main content

LaFleur v. LaFleur

Citations

  • 452 N.W.2d 406
  • 1990 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 71
  • 1990 WL 32192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that when compensation is geared toward results and not to the amount of labor performed, it is indicative of an independent contractor rather than an employee
  • discussing several elements, but noting the “ ‘right to control the details of performance is the crucial factor’”
  • considering the parties’ intent, even though stating the right of control was the most crucial factor
  • stating intent “is an important consideration in determining what sort of relationship the parties created”
  • considering failure to withhold tax and social security

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Schultz, Layorato, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named LaFleur v. LaFleur

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.