Lafayette Insurance v. Peerboom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, for similar reasons, that the exclusion applied to bar coverage
• construing “that particular part” to apply to the entire residence where contractor’s work involved raising residence above flood plain
• “an insured’s intentional actions do not constitute ‘accidents,’ and the damages resulting therefrom do not amount to ‘occurrences,’ even if the insured acts in a negligent manner.”
• “an insured’s intentional actions do not constitute ‘accidents,’ and the damages resulting therefrom do not amount to ‘occurrences,’ even if the insured acts in a negligent manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).