Eulich v. Home Indemnity Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[l]iability for damage to the building resulting from [the failure to] comply with specifications is exactly the type of liability which the [exclusion] was evidently intended to exclude”
• “Plaintiff concedes that according to dictionary definitions, ‘work’ as used twice in exclusion (k
• wherein the court held a policy excluded coverage of a contractor’s liability for damage resulting from the collapse of a building caused by the contractor’s failure to follow specifications
• \property damage to work performed\ includes damage to building constructed by insured contractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).