Skip to main content

Lacombe v. Lacombe

Citations

  • 85 So. 3d 721
  • 11 La.App. 3 Cir. 1178
  • 2012 WL 280705
  • 2012 La. App. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wherein the court explained that the acceptance of a spouse’s “entire list, including [the spouse’s] reimbursement claim, would essentially negate the need for further proceedings, evidence, or depositions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Painter, Saunders, Thibodeaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Lacombe v. Lacombe

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.