Rosell v. Esco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen the court of appeal finds that a reversible error of law…was made in the trial court, it is required to redetermine the facts de novo from the entire record and render a judgment on the merits.”
• “[W]hen the 13 court of appeal finds that a reversible error of law…was made in the trial court, it is required to redetermine the facts de novo from the entire record and render a judgment on the merits.”
• “[W]hen the 13 court of appeal finds that a reversible error of law…was made in the trial court, it is required to redetermine the facts de novo from the entire record and render a judgment on the merits.”
• ... if the trial court or jury findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse even though convinced that had it been sitting as trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).