Labrenz v. Burnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s denial of equitable estoppel where the trial court “heard testimony from [the party to be estopped] that he believed that [the] . . . fence w[as] temporary”
• “We review the superior court’s legal conclusions de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ronny M. v. Nanette H.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-05-31· cited 43×
• Jerry B. v. Sally B.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2016-06-10· cited 19×
• Offshore Systems-Kenai v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 15×
• Societe Financial, LLC d/b/a Alaska ATM, and James Dainis, individually v. MJ Corporation d/b/a Shell and 15th Grill
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2024-02-16· cited 9×
• Williams v. Baker
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2019-08-02· cited 8×
• Browne v. Stanley
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2017-02-02· cited 6×
• Mark N. Wayson v. William E. Stevenson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2022-08-12· cited 5×
• John P. Beardsley, Janet N. Beardsley, and Seaport Air Group, LLC v. Robert N. Jacobsen & Darlene F. Jacobsen Living Trust and Wings Airline Services, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2020-09-18· cited 2×
• John Reeves and Fairbanks Gold Co., LLC v. Godspeed Properties, LLC and Gold Dredge 8, LLC, Godspeed Properties, LLC and Gold Dredge 8, LLC v. John Reeves and Fairbanks Gold Co., LLC
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2022-09-16