Labbe v. Nissen Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that enactment of additional provision showed an intent to change the law
• offering an “edited” version of a statutory provision only as an illustration of the Court’s construction of the statute based on a reasonable interpretation of the actual text
• \Nothing in a statute may be treated as surplusage if a reasonable construction supplying meaning and force is otherwise possible.\
• contacts must be “fairly extensive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).