Skip to main content
· 2/9/1973

In Re Spring Valley Development

Citations

  • 300 A.2d 736
  • 5 ERC 1127
  • 3 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20589
  • 5 ERC (BNA) 1127
  • 1973 Me. LEXIS 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting similar commercial requirement for jurisdiction under analogous Maine land use act
  • interpreting similar commercial requirement for jurisdiction under analogous Maine land use act
  • finding it indisputable that limitations on the use of property for the purpose of protecting the quality of air, soil and water from unreasonable destruction \for the protection of the public health and welfare is within the police power\
  • effects of development on property values was outside purposes of site location law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dufresne, Web-Ber, Weatherbee, Pomeroy, Wernick, Archibald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.