Laack v. Botello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we “ ‘normally review the amount of an award of costs for abuse of discretion, but, to the extent the court’s decision is based on its interpretation of an agreement or statute, we review for error of law’ ”
• explaining that we “ ‘normally review the amount of an award of costs for abuse of discretion, but, to the extent the court’s decision is based on its interpretation of an agreement or statute, we review for error of law’ ”
• “[W]hen jurisdiction is vested by an appeal of a limited or supplemental judgment, we lack jurisdiction to decide specific issues memorialized in other judgments that were not appealed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 22×
• Shumake v. Foshee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-02· cited 22×
• Klutschkowski v. PeaceHealth
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-09-26· cited 17×
• Phillips v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-26· cited 13×
• White v. Vogt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-14· cited 11×
• Clackamas County Oregon, May 21 v. Clackamas River Water
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-24· cited 6×
• R. S. R. v. Dept. of Human Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-20· cited 6×
• Klutschkowski v. PeaceHealth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-21· cited 5×
• Butler Block, LLC v. Agni Group, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-02· cited 3×
• Moir v. Ozeruga
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-08· cited 3×