Shumake v. Foshee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a remand would be inappropriate where, “on the facts of a particular case, our ruling means that there is only one legally permissible decision”
• explaining that findings of fact for an enhanced prevailing party fee under ORS 20.190(3) “con- cerning the conduct of the parties during the course of the proceedings” are reviewed “for any evidence” in the record
• standard of review of factual findings pertaining to allowance of enhanced prevailing party fee in nonequity civil proceedings is “for any evidence”
• where statute specifies court “may” award fees, we review nonfact questions for abuse of discretion
• when a trial court decides not to award an “enhanced prevailing party fee” under ORS 20.190(3), 1 The superintendent did not argue below that ORS 20.190(3
• We review any underlying findings of fact in an attorney fee dispute “as we usually review findings of fact in nonequity civil proceedings — that is, for any evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re the Marriage of Niman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-06-14· cited 21×
• Grisby v. Progressive Preferred Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-06· cited 16×
• Glover v. Bank of New York
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-11· cited 9×
• Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-19· cited 8×
• Hanley Engineering v. Weitz & Company
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-08-10· cited 8×
• Lenn v. Bottem
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 7×
• Morris v. Kanne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-16· cited 6×
• Hoover v. Industrial Scrap Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 5×
• Country Casualty Insurance v. Villa-Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-27· cited 4×
• North Marion School District 15 v. Acstar Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-07-05· cited 4×
• Laack v. Botello
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-05· cited 3×
• Wolf and Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-03· cited 2×
• State ex rel. Stewart v. City of Salem
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-22· cited 2×
• Weitman Excavation, LLC v. CPM Development Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-24· cited 2×
• Asato v. Dunn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-07-12· cited 1×
• Palmquist v. Flir Systems, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-08-23· cited 1×
• State ex rel. O'Connor v. Helm
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-23· cited 1×
• Springleaf Home Equity, Inc. v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-21· cited 1×
• Lujan v. Bowser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-01
• Lycette v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-08