Shumake v. Foshee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a remand would be inappropriate where, “on the facts of a particular case, our ruling means that there is only one legally permissible decision”
• explaining that findings of fact for an enhanced prevailing party fee under ORS 20.190(3) “con- cerning the conduct of the parties during the course of the proceedings” are reviewed “for any evidence” in the record
• standard of review of factual findings pertaining to allowance of enhanced prevailing party fee in nonequity civil proceedings is “for any evidence”
• where statute specifies court “may” award fees, we review nonfact questions for abuse of discretion
• when a trial court decides not to award an “enhanced prevailing party fee” under ORS 20.190(3), 1 The superintendent did not argue below that ORS 20.190(3
• We review any underlying findings of fact in an attorney fee dispute “as we usually review findings of fact in nonequity civil proceedings — that is, for any evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).