Kvidera v. Rotation Engineering & Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[R]espondent’s right to the [bonus] vested ... the day after the expiration of the [applicable bonus period].”
• “[RJespondent’s right to the [bonus] vested ... the day after the expiration of the [applicable bonus period].”
• “[S]tatutory penalties permitting the award of attorney fees are designed to encourage parties with potentially modest damages to bring their claims.”
• company president’s bonus was statutory wage because it was “integral and negotiated part of his compensation package” and his “services contributed to [the company’s] profitability, and [the company] received the benefit of [the president’s] work product”
• “Because [Minn. Stat. § 181.13(a)] is penal in nature, it must be strictly construed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).