Rohr v. Ted Neiters Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding bonuses related to a profit-sharing plan to be \earned\ months before they were required to be paid
• finding that car salesman’s bonus was “earned” and therefore “became vested and determinable as of the date of termination, even though not due and payable for two and one-half months thereafter,” and therefore was subject to the provisions of the CWA
• bonus was earned as of the date of termination even though not due and payable until months later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).