Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state-law statute-of-limitations defense may be litigated for first time in motion for directed verdict because defense was preserved under Rule 8(c) by its “bare assertion” in defendant’s answer
• statute of limitations affirmative defense \need not be raised with any rigorous degree of specificity\ and bare assertion in answer is sufficient to prevent waiver
• “bare assertion” of statute of limitations in answer preserved it to be raised again mid-trial, despite defendant’s failure to raise it in pretrial dispositive motions
• “bare assertion” of statute of limitations in answer preserved it to be raised again mid-trial, despite defendant’s failure to raise it in pretrial dispositive motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea Boliviana
  Second Circuit· 1998-12-11· cited 145×
• Katherine A. Zotos v. Lindbergh School District O. Victor Lenz, Jr. Joseph A. Sartorius
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-07-30· cited 137×
• Executive Sandwich Shoppe, Inc. v. Carr Realty Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-04-13· cited 108×
• In Re Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation
  S.D. New York· 1991-08-30· cited 82×
• Jean-Laurent v. Hennessy
  E.D. New York· 2011-10-24· cited 77×
• Daingerfield Island Protective Society v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior
  D.C. Circuit· 1995-02-08· cited 74×
• Legal Aid Society v. City of New York
  S.D. New York· 2000-09-18· cited 50×
• Sales v. Grant
  Fourth Circuit· 2000-08-16· cited 47×
• Long v. Howard University
  District of Columbia· 2007-10-25· cited 42×
• Levy v. Young Adult Institute, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2015-04-30· cited 38×
• In Re Pfohl Bros. Landfill Litigation
  W.D. New York· 1998-10-27· cited 12×
• Jones v. Cattaraugus-Little Valley Cent. Sch. Dist.
  Second Circuit· 2024-03-20· cited 11×
• Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
  D. Nevada· 1998-01-28· cited 8×
• In Re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1992-04-28· cited 7×
• Gelb v. Board of Elections in the City of New York
  S.D. New York· 1996-12-02· cited 7×
• Bilick v. Eagle Electric Manufacturing Co.
  E.D. New York· 1992-11-02· cited 6×
• Colon v. Goord
  Second Circuit· 2004-10-20· cited 4×
• Henley v. Slone
  D. Connecticut· 1991-10-02· cited 3×
• Xerox State & Local Solutions, Inc. v. Xchanging Solutions (USA), Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2016-10-20· cited 3×
• Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1991-08-08

Other cases named Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1991-08-08