Skip to main content
· 7/30/1997

Katherine A. Zotos v. Lindbergh School District O. Victor Lenz, Jr. Joseph A. Sartorius

Citations

  • 121 F.3d 356
  • 38 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1073
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 19496
  • 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,850
  • 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1055
  • 1997 WL 422792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While a limitations defense must be asserted in a responsive pleading, it need not be articulated with any rigorous degree of specificity, and is sufficiently raised for purposes of Rule 8 by its bare assertion.” (cleaned up and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Henley, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.