Kulling v. Grinders for Industry, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that loss of consortium damages are not available under the ADEA
• finding that plaintiff’s “claim under the ADEA survives his death, except to the extent that it seeks an award of ‘liquidated damages’”
• declining to apply § 1988(a) because “the ADEA lacks any provision analogous to § 1988, which expressly invites the courts to look to state law where federal law is ‘deficient’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).