Kristensen v. Credit Payment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that agency determinations in a TCPA class action “can be resolved on a class-wide basis”
• associating the party who ‘made’ the call with ‘the party who actually sent the text message to [Plaintiff]”
• finding-superiority requirement met in a putative class action where the court could review individual affidavits averring lack of consent rather than holding thousands of separate trials
• finding lack of evidence of express consent in TCPA case means that “courts should ignore a defendant’s argument that proving consent necessitates individualized inquiries” (citing Meyer, 707 F.3d at 1042-43)
• finding superiority requirement met in a putative TCPA class action where the Court could review individual affidavits averring lack of consent to receive text messages sent on behalf of Defendant to Plaintiffs cell phone
• “Although the precise 8 details of the agency relationship need not be pleaded to survive a motion to dismiss, sufficient 9 facts must be offered to support a reasonable inference that an agency relationship existed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jose Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-09-19· cited 102×
• Shyriaa Henderson v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-03-22· cited 41×
• Flemming Kristensen v. Credit Payment Services Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-01-10· cited 29×
• Ott v. Mortgage Investors Corp. of Ohio, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 2014-12-03· cited 27×
• Hossfeld v. Government Employees Insurance
  D. Maryland· 2015-02-25· cited 24×
• Abdeljalil v. General Electric Capital Corp.
  S.D. California· 2015-03-26· cited 16×
• Mey v. Venture Data, LLC
  N.D. West Virginia· 2017-03-29· cited 15×
• Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.
  N.D. California· 2016-07-21· cited 14×
• In re Monitronics International, Inc.
  N.D. West Virginia· 2016-12-22· cited 13×
• Bee, Denning, Inc. v. Capital Alliance Group
  S.D. California· 2015-09-24· cited 11×
• Ung v. Universal Acceptance Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2017-01-24· cited 8×
• Arwa Chiropractic, P.C. v. Med-Care Diabetic & Medical Supplies, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-09-29· cited 8×
• Bridge v. Credit One Fin., Corp.
  D. Nevada· 2018-02-23· cited 7×
• Blair v. CBE Group, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2015-08-26· cited 5×
• Mohamed v. American Motor Co.
  S.D. Florida· 2017-07-12· cited 5×
• Villanueva v. Liberty Acquisitions Servicing, LLC
  D. Oregon· 2017-01-13· cited 3×
• Silver v. City of Albuquerque
  Tenth Circuit· 2025-04-23· cited 2×
• Robert W. Clough, II on behalf of himself and other similarly situated v. Revenue Frontier, LLC et al.
  D. New Hampshire· 2019-06-19· cited 1×
• Reyes v. Educational Credit Management Corp.
  S.D. California· 2017-09-20

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
• Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
• Skidmore v. Swift & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
• General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
• Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
  Supreme Court· 2013-03-27· cited 1,534×
• Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-09-16· cited 650×
• Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-07· cited 398×
• In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.
  First Circuit· 2006-12-05· cited 315×
• Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-19· cited 244×
• Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-10-12· cited 192×
• In Re Wells Fargo Home Mortg. Overtime Pay Lit.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-07· cited 138×
• Gene and Gene LLC v. BIOPAY LLC
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-08-14· cited 134×
• James Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-07-31· cited 106×
• Benjamin Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-02-03· cited 92×
• Marlo v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-04-28· cited 79×
• Xavier v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
  N.D. California· 2011-04-18· cited 47×
• Keilholtz v. Lennox Hearth Products Inc.
  N.D. California· 2010-02-16· cited 44×