Krawiec v. Manly
Citations
- 811 S.E.2d 542
- 370 N.C. 602
Syllabus
Interlocutory appeal from N.C. Business Court order granting defendants' motions to dismiss certain claims under Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plaintiffs did not properly identify customer lists as trade secrets where plaintiffs failed to allege “that the lists contained any information that would not be readily accessible to defendants”
- concluding that identification of trade secrets as “original ideas and concepts for dance productions, marketing strategies and tactics, as well as student, client and customer lists and their contact information” was insufficiently particular
- holding that “a complaint that makes general allegations in sweeping and conclusory statements, without specifically identifying the trade secrets allegedly misappropriated, is insufficient to state a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets” (cleaned up)
- holding that “a complaint that makes general allegations in sweeping and conclusory statements, without specifically identifying the trade secrets allegedly misappropriated, is insufficient to state a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets” (cleaned up)
- holding that a plaintiff’s mere “expectation of confidentiality[,]” without allegations of a “method, plan or other act by which [plaintiff] attempted to maintain the secrecy of the alleged trade secrets[,]” was insufficient under Rule 12(b)(6)
- holding “information regarding . . . pricing formulas and bidding formulas can qualify as a trade secret”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jackson, Beasley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
154 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Corwin as Trustee for Beatrice Corwin Living Irrevocable Trust v. British American Tobacco PLCSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-07· cited 201×
- Crawford's Auto Center, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2019-12-20· cited 39×
- Sysco Machinery Corporation v. DCS USA CorporationFourth Circuit· 2025-07-09· cited 19×
- Silver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-21· cited 18×
- Sterling Title Company v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-08-06· cited 14×
- Dillon v. Leazer Group, Inc.E.D. North Carolina· 2019-03-18· cited 14×
- Musselwhite v. CheshireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-07-02· cited 10×
- Bite Busters, LLC v. BurrisNorth Carolina Business Court· 2021-03-25· cited 3×
- Comput. Design & Integration, LLC v. BrownNorth Carolina Business Court· 2018-12-10· cited 1×
- Charah, LLC v. Sequoia Servs., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court· 2019-03-11· cited 1×
- Window Gang Ventures, Corp. v. SalinasNorth Carolina Business Court· 2019-04-02· cited 1×
- Beam v. Sunset Fin. Servs., Inc.North Carolina Business Court· 2019-09-03· cited 1×
- Aldridge v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.North Carolina Business Court· 2019-12-31· cited 1×
- Value Health Sols. Inc. v. Pharm. Research Assocs.North Carolina Business Court· 2020-05-22· cited 1×
- Martin Commc'ns, LLC v. FlowersNorth Carolina Business Court· 2021-03-31· cited 1×
- Villa Capriani Homeowners Ass'n v. Lexington Ins. Co.North Carolina Business Court· 2021-10-14· cited 1×
- Loray Master Tenant, LLC v. Foss N.C. Mill Credit 2014 Fund I, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court· 2021-12-13· cited 1×
- McNew v. Fletcher Hosp., Inc.North Carolina Business Court· 2022-09-20· cited 1×
- SciGrip, Inc. v. OsaeSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2020-02-28
- Robinson v. Halifax Reg'l Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-04-21
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2002-12-18· cited 706×
- Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court· 1952-02-28· cited 115×
- Home Pride Foods, Inc. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-10-19· cited 84×
- Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGSMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-09-10· cited 70×
- Ed Nowogroski Insurance v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court· 1999-02-25· cited 65×
- ED NOWOGROSKI INS., INC. v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court· 1999-02-25· cited 60×
- SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals Co. v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2000-12-01· cited 57×
- American Credit Indemnity Co. v. SacksCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-08-29· cited 55×
- Furmanite America, Inc. v. T.D. Williamson, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2007-04-11· cited 42×
- Merck & Co. Inc. v. LyonM.D. North Carolina· 1996-09-11· cited 38×
- Super Maid Cook-Ware Corporation v. HamilFifth Circuit· 1931-06-22· cited 31×
- Glaxo Inc. v. Novopharm Ltd.E.D. North Carolina· 1996-07-05· cited 28×
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Ridgeway BrandsSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2008-08-27· cited 25×
- UBS PaineWebber, Inc. v. AikenW.D. North Carolina· 2002-03-15· cited 22×
- Asheboro Paper and Packaging, Inc. v. DickinsonM.D. North Carolina· 2009-02-19· cited 21×
- American Dairy Queen Corporation v. AugustynN.D. Illinois· 1967-09-11· cited 17×
- Jeffries v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2002-06-27· cited 11×
- Barbarino v. CAPPUCCINE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2012-03-06· cited 3×
- Olympus Managed Health Care, Inc. v. American Housecall Physicians, Inc.W.D. North Carolina· 2012-02-21· cited 2×
Other cases named Krawiec v. Manly
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Krawiec v. ManlyNorth Carolina Business Court· 2016-01-22· cited 1×
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina· 2017-01-26
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina· 2016-07-21
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina· 2016-12-07
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina· 2017-01-26
- Krawiec v. ManlyNorth Carolina Business Court· 2015-08-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.