Kravec v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing Stebbins I as the “leading case” in, determining the prevailing venue provision
• The “general venue statute, 28 USC § 1391, did not provide an additional place of venue where the terms of § 2000e–5(f)(3) were not met,” and upon reviewing the “clear language of § 2000e–5(f)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).