Dinkins v. Charoen Pokphand USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting narrow definition of “supervisor” because it “improperly truncate[d] the Supreme Court’s holdings in Faragher and Ellerth,” and because these cases indicate “analysis of employment relationships involves multifactorial analysis rather than simplistic taxonomy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).