Skip to main content
· 12/29/2010

Kramer v. AUTOBYTEL, INC.

Citations

  • 759 F. Supp. 2d 1165
  • 52 Communications Reg. (P&F) 167
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137257
  • 2010 WL 5463116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that impersonal nature of messages, number of messages, “short code” sending number, and lack of relationship with plaintiff all supported inference of ATDS use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Claudia Wilken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.