· 12/29/2010
Kramer v. AUTOBYTEL, INC.
Citations
- 759 F. Supp. 2d 1165
- 52 Communications Reg. (P&F) 167
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137257
- 2010 WL 5463116
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that impersonal nature of messages, number of messages, “short code” sending number, and lack of relationship with plaintiff all supported inference of ATDS use
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Claudia Wilken
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.