Kraft v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that possession of a pipe of the type used for marijuana smoking does not come under the umbrella of Article 27, Section 287(d)
• defendant was “wild and fighting,” threatened officers, and was overpowered only after a struggle in which officer was forced to employ mace to gain compliance
• defendant was “wild and fighting,” threatened officers, and was overpowered only after a struggle in which officer was forced to employ mace to gain compliance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Marcel Aparicio-Soria
  Fourth Circuit· 2014-01-14· cited 60×
• Busch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-03-13· cited 44×
• Glover v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-06· cited 22×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-04· cited 18×
• Trusty v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-19· cited 6×
• United States v. Marcel Aparicio-Soria
  Fourth Circuit· 2013-07-05· cited 4×
• Rodgers v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-06-25· cited 4×
• State v. Ott
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-29· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-01· cited 93×
• Messina v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-04-05· cited 42×
• Matter of Nawrocki
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-04-25· cited 30×
• Soles v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-26· cited 28×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-04-29· cited 15×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-07-25· cited 10×
• Kirkorian v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-01-24· cited 6×