Kozich v. DeBrino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the findings of fact and conclusions of law made at a temporary injunction hearing are not binding on the court on final hearing, where the parties can present their full case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Whitby v. Infinity Radio Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-24· cited 21×
• Advantage Digital Sys., Inc. v. DIGITAL IMAG. SERV., INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-03· cited 12×
• Charlotte County v. Vetter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-21· cited 7×
• Village of North Palm Beach v. S & H Foster's, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-22· cited 4×
• PM REALTY & INVESTMENTS, INC. v. City of Tampa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-23· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-10-04· cited 1,882×
• Ladner v. PLAZA DEL PRADO, ETC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-11-16· cited 51×
• El Segundo Original Rey De La Pizza Cubana, Inc. v. Rey Pizza Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-13· cited 6×
• Badger v. Badger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-19· cited 4×
• Lorie v. CLN
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 4×