Skip to main content

Badger v. Badger

Citations

  • 568 So. 2d 79
  • 1990 WL 133805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We commence by pointing out that the order ... holding the husband in contempt was a non-final order. That being the case, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) was not available to the husband, since that rule may be directed only to final judgments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Downey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.