Skip to main content
· 2/8/1990

Kowalski v. Boyles

Citations

  • 557 So. 2d 885
  • 1990 WL 9296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in ruling on the legal sufficiency of a motion to disqualify, the judge may explain the status of the record
  • holding that the judge’s factual recital of what took place at the questioned hearing was a permissible comment on the record as the judge was not attempting to refute charges of partiality
  • holding that trial court was correct in denying appellants’ motion to disqualify because appellants’ subjective fears were not reasonably sufficient to create a well- founded fear they would not receive a fair and impartial trial
  • treating an appeal of a nonfinal order denying an application for disqualification of a judge as a petition for writ of prohibition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.