Skip to main content
N.D. Texas· 3/5/2019

Kovac v. Wray

Citations

  • 363 F. Supp. 3d 721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiffs adequately pled constitutional claim in part because they “allege that Defendants’ interference is not necessary to further a compelling governmental interest and license. La. R.S. 37:2360(A)(1
  • noting, even where no injury found, “[t]he Screening List Plaintiffs allege that they have been victims of regular secondary inspections, prolonged searches, interrogations, and restrictions traveling abroad”
  • “When a party fails to pursue a claim or defense beyond the party’s initial complaint, the claim is deemed abandoned or waived.”
  • “When a party fails to pursue a claim or defense beyond the party's initial complaint, the claim is deemed abandoned or waived.”
  • Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 711 (1976)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindsay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

117 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kovac v. Wray

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.