Skip to main content
· 12/9/2003

Kondamuri v. Kondamuri

Citations

  • 799 N.E.2d 1153
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 2285
  • 2003 WL 22889416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that once jurisdictional challenge has been lodged, party’s contemporaneous or subsequent defense on the merits does not invoke affirmative relief barring jurisdictional claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Bailey, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.