Skip to main content
· 1/14/1997

Komosa v. Komosa

Citations

  • 939 S.W.2d 479
  • 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 38
  • 1997 WL 9982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Any state restriction which significantly interferes with the exercise of a fundamental right is subject to strict scrutiny and cannot be upheld unless it is supported by sufficiently important state interests and is closely tailored to effectuate only those interests.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gerald M. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.