Clay v. Clay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Monthly video calls were minimally intrusive because they could take place at the parent’s home with no limitation on the parent’s presence.
• in determining visitation was not excessive under the particular facts of the case, it was relevant that the grandmother “had relatively frequent contact with Child during the first 20 months of her life, and the relationship between the two was loving and close”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• TIMOTHY J. BALDON, Petitioner-Respondent v. AMANDA E. BALDON
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-03-03
• X.P.E.L., By His Next Friend, C.T., and C.T., Individually v. J.L.L.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-06-08
• Melissa Aldridge v. Devin Martin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2023-04-18
• Flaigan v. Kittelson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-08-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Herndon v. Tuhey
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-06-29· cited 66×
• Blakely v. Blakely
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2002-08-27· cited 29×
• Barker v. Barker
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-03-04· cited 25×
• Komosa v. Komosa
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-01-14· cited 16×
• Ray v. Hannon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-03-21· cited 10×
• Simpson v. Buck
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-06-30· cited 8×
• Shemwell v. Arni
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-05-29· cited 3×
• Keeran v. Myers
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-09-23· cited 3×