Kohler Manuf'g Co. v. Beeshore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• there must be an intention “to adopt [the mark] as a trademark”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New York
  Second Circuit· 1974-04-09· cited 197×
• Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Products, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1991-04-08· cited 113×
• American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Mfg. Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1900-07-13· cited 72×
• Hydro-Dynamics, Inc. v. George Putnam & Company, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1987-02-11· cited 70×
• Le Blume Import Co. v. Coty
  Second Circuit· 1923-06-18· cited 68×
• Gold Dust Corporation v. Hoffenberg
  Second Circuit· 1937-01-04· cited 41×
• L. P. Larson, Jr., Co. v. Wm. Wrigley, Jr., Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1918-07-30· cited 37×
• Richter v. Reynolds
  Third Circuit· 1893-12-12· cited 18×
• Waldes v. International Mfrs.' Agency, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1916-12-08· cited 15×
• Ohio Baking Co. v. National Biscuit Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1904-01-21· cited 14×
• Worden v. Cannaliato
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-01-02· cited 8×
• Recamier, Mfg. Co. v. Harriet Hubbard Ayer, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1932-04-13· cited 7×
• Moxie Nerve Food Co. of New England v. Holland
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island· 1905-12-12· cited 4×
• California Fig-Syrup Co. v. Putnam
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1895-03-06· cited 3×
• Norwine Coffee Co. v. Chase & Sanborn
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1932-05-23· cited 1×
• Ford Motor Company v. Summit Motor Products, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1991-05-13
• New York Dental Parlors v. Froon
  Illinois Circuit Court· 1899-07-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Menendez v. Holt
  Supreme Court· 1888-12-10· cited 471×
• Wolfe v. . Burke
  New York Court of Appeals· 1874-03-24· cited 27×
• Ryder v. Holt
  Supreme Court· 1888-12-10· cited 18×
• Richter v. Anchor Remedy Co.
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania· 1892-09-14· cited 12×
• Filkins v. Blackman
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut· 1876-06-30· cited 8×
• Fowle v. Spear
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania· 1847-11-07· cited 6×
• Smith v. Woodruff
  New York Supreme Court· 1867-04-01· cited 5×