Skip to main content
· 2/11/1987

Hydro-Dynamics, Inc. v. George Putnam & Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 811 F.2d 1470
  • 1 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1772
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that single bona fide shipment in commerce may support registration
  • \Whether a trademark has been ‘adopted’ is a factual finding whose resolution may include elements of subjective intent\
  • “The common law and the Lanham Act require that trademark ownership be accorded to the first bona fide user.”
  • “[Trademark rights in the United States are acquired by adoption and use, not by registration.”
  • The “decision as to priority is made in accordance with the preponderance of the evidence”
  • The “decision as to priority is made in accordance with the preponderance of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Bennett, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.