Knox County v. Harshman
Citations
- 132 U.S. 14
- 10 S. Ct. 8
- 33 L. Ed. 249
- 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1835
Syllabus
<p>An appeal from a decree granting, refusing, or dissolving an injunction does not disturb its operative effect.</p> <p>When an injunction has been dissolved it cannot be revived except by a new exercise of judicial power.</p> <p>The prosecution of an appeal cannot operate as an injunction where none has been granted.</p> <p>Although a bill to impeach a judgment at law is regarded as auxiliary or dependent, and not as an original bill, the supersedure of process on the decree dismissing the bill does not operate to supersede process on the judgment at law.</p>
Judges: Fuller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 535×
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-12-08· cited 189×
- National Surety Co. v. State BankEighth Circuit· 1903-02-02· cited 139×
- Merrimack River Savings Bank v. City of Clay CenterSupreme Court· 1911-02-20· cited 81×
- Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1922-11-20· cited 56×
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 45×
- MINNEAPOLIS RR v. Peoria Ry.Supreme Court· 1926-03-01· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Gibson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1905-05-29· cited 21×
- Heikkila v. BarberN.D. California· 1958-07-01· cited 19×
- Ex parte WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court· 1894-01-15· cited 16×
- State ex rel. Bettman v. HarnessWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1896-11-25· cited 12×
- Jenner v. MurrayFifth Circuit· 1929-05-17· cited 12×
- Brill v. General Industrial Enterprises, Inc.Third Circuit· 1956-06-20· cited 12×
- Chesapeake Western Ry. v. JardineD.C. Circuit· 1925-11-02· cited 6×
- Hulan v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court· 1910-02-03· cited 6×
- Staffords v. KingFourth Circuit· 1898-11-01· cited 4×
- Brill v. General Industrial EnterprisesThird Circuit· 1956-06-20· cited 2×
- New River Mineral Co. v. SeeleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia· 1902-09-22· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. OslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-10-07
- Carter v. GearHawaii Supreme Court· 1904-11-30
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.