Knox County v. Harshman
Citations
- 133 U.S. 152
- 10 S. Ct. 257
- 33 L. Ed. 586
- 1890 U.S. LEXIS 1897
Syllabus
<p>A court of equity does not interfere with judgments at law, unless the complainant has an equitable defence of Which he could not avail himself at law, or had a good defence at law which he was prevented from availing himself of by fraud or accident, unmixed with negligence of himself or his agents.</p> <p>Sarshman V. Knox County, Í22 U. S. 306, affirmed.</p> <p>Where by statute the summons in any action against a county may be served upon the clerk of the county court, and the officer’s return in such an action shows süch a service, the county cannot maintain a bill in equity, to restrain process of execution upon the judgment, on the ground that service was not made upon the clerk, or that he did not inform the county court thereof.</p>
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court· 1944-05-15· cited 1,010×
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court· 1891-11-09· cited 289×
- Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court· 1934-03-05· cited 184×
- National Surety Co. v. State BankEighth Circuit· 1903-02-02· cited 139×
- Mechanical Appliance Co. v. CastlemanSupreme Court· 1910-01-03· cited 96×
- Massari v. EinsiedlerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1951-02-05· cited 62×
- Smoot v. JuddSupreme Court of Missouri· 1904-11-29· cited 45×
- Miedreich v. LauensteinSupreme Court· 1914-02-02· cited 43×
- Whittaker v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1930-09-10· cited 29×
- Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp.Second Circuit· 1948-02-27· cited 22×
- In Re Fox West Coast TheatresNinth Circuit· 1937-02-23· cited 20×
- Continental Nat. Bank of Jackson County v. Holland Banking Co.Eighth Circuit· 1933-07-24· cited 19×
- Moffett v. RobbinsTenth Circuit· 1936-01-15· cited 18×
- John E. Smith's Sons Co. v. Lattimer Foundry & Machine Co.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1956-07-30· cited 17×
- Grimes v. BarndollarSupreme Court of Colorado· 1914-12-07· cited 16×
- Jenner v. MurrayFifth Circuit· 1929-05-17· cited 12×
- Davis v. DavisFifth Circuit· 1896-02-04· cited 12×
- Riverside Oil & Refining Co. v. DudleyEighth Circuit· 1929-06-04· cited 11×
- Denton v. BakerNinth Circuit· 1899-02-06· cited 11×
- McMahan v. WhelanOregon Supreme Court· 1904-03-01· cited 8×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court· 1813-02-18· cited 218×
- Hendrickson v. HinckleySupreme Court· 1855-02-12· cited 68×
- Crim v. HandleySupreme Court· 1877-04-16· cited 65×
- Commissioners v. SellewSupreme Court· 1879-03-18· cited 63×
- Ambler v. ChoteauSupreme Court· 1883-01-22· cited 52×
- United States v. AthertonSupreme Court· 1880-12-20· cited 42×
- Walker v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 1853-03-18· cited 31×
Other cases named Knox County v. Harshman
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.