Knorr v. Berryhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[R]emanding for the ALJ to reconsider this evidence, which the 22 ALJ already had an opportunity to review, would simply be allowing the ALJ to have a 23 second bite at the apple.”
• “[R]emanding for the 12 ALJ to reconsider this evidence, which the ALJ already had an opportunity to 13 review, would simply be allowing the ALJ to have a second bite at the apple.”
• “[R]emanding for the ALJ to reconsider this evidence, which the ALJ already had 18 an opportunity to review, would simply be allowing the ALJ to have a second bite at the 19 apple.”
• same, and noting that “remanding for the ALJ to reconsider 15 this evidence, which the ALJ already had an opportunity to review, 16 would simply be allowing the ALJ to have a second bite at the 17 apple.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).