Knopick v. UBS AG

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a Swiss court is better suited to interpret questions under Swiss law, which was the law agreed to in the parties’ forum selection clause
• “While the Court acknowledges that Pennsylvania has a local interest in banking regulation, the Court is persuaded that Switzerland has an equally strong interest in policing the foreign activities of its native financial institutions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLC
  D. Massachusetts· 2017-12-08· cited 15×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 4,581×
• The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 3,455×
• Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.
  Supreme Court· 2013-12-03· cited 3,278×
• Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,844×
• Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.
  Supreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 1,616×
• Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute
  Supreme Court· 1991-04-17· cited 1,405×
• Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.
  Third Circuit· 1983-05-17· cited 365×
• Faulkenberg v. CB Tax Franchise Systems, LP
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-03-29· cited 172×
• Paper Express, Limited, an Illinois Corporation v. Pfankuch Maschinen Gmbh, a German Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-08-11· cited 161×
• Rucker v. Oasis Legal Finance, L.L.C
  Eleventh Circuit· 2011-02-11· cited 47×
• Silvis v. Ambit Energy, L.P.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-03-13· cited 13×
• Dawes v. Publish Am. LLP
  Supreme Court· 2015-01-20· cited 1×