Skip to main content

Knight v. State

Citations

  • 770 So. 2d 663
  • 2000 WL 1637572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a Faretta inquiry conducted at a pretrial hearing satisfied the requirement to offer counsel at the start of trial because the pretrial hearing was held to discuss the upcoming trial and there were no intervening proceedings
  • noting the “delicate balance between a defendant’s right to counsel and the right to self- representation”
  • “There is a delicate balance between a defendant’s right to counsel and the right to self-representation.”
  • “Standby counsel is a constant reminder to a self-representing defendant of his right to court-appointed counsel at any stage of the proceeding.”
  • “A defendant’s right to have court-appointed counsel discharged and right to represent himself becomes meaningless and a source of gamesmanship if the trial court has to offer counsel to the defendant each time he appears in court.”
  • “A defendant’s right to have court-appointed counsel discharged and right to represent himself becomes meaningless and a source of 8 gamesmanship if the trial court has to offer counsel to the defendant each time he appears in court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.