Skip to main content

Knight v. Jewett

Citations

  • 834 P.2d 696
  • 3 Cal. 4th 296
  • 11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 2
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 11870
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7261
  • 1992 Cal. LEXIS 3969

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a patient “by voluntarily encountering” a risk of injury does not “ ‘impliedly consent’ to negligently inflicted injury or ‘impliedly agree’ to excuse the surgeon from a normal duty of care”
  • stating that a jury may use comparative fault to achieve “equitable apportionment” based on relative responsibility “whether ... responsibility for the injury rests on negligence, strict liability, or other theories of responsibility ” (emphasis added)
  • applying a recklessness standard to an injury in an informal game of coed football
  • player in a touch football game assumed the risks associated with playing the game with exuberant participants
  • a defense where a finger was stepped on by a fellow participant in a touch football game
  • when plaintiff incurred injury in voluntary participation in dangerous sport, the defendant’s duty of care must be examined in relation to the nature of the sport

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George, Mosk, Panelli, Kennard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.