Ferrari v. Grand Canyon Dories

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that courts do not extend the “ ‘doctrine of strict liability to transactions whose primary objective is obtaining services’ ”
• finding no duty for white water rafting operator to pad a metal frame in the raft because the rafts define the nature of the sport and a change in the watercraft would reduce the challenge of the sport
• primary assumption of the risk doctrine barred recovery by individual injured while whitewater rafting when head struck metal frame of raft; owner of the rafting company did not increase the inherent risks of the sport

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).