Washington Supreme Court· 10/29/2009
Kitsap County Deputy Sheriff's Guild v. Kitsap County
Citations
- 167 Wash. 2d 428
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that an explicit, well-defined, and dominant public policy may stem from federal statutes that impose an affirmative duty to prevent misconduct by law enforcement officers
- “Washington has no similar statute . . . placing an affirmative duty on counties to prevent police officers from ever being untruthful.”
- arbitration decision to reinstate deputy sheriff who was terminated for twenty-nine documented incidents of misconduct, including untruthfulness, did not violate explicit, well-defined, and dominant public policy
- adopting \the narrow public policy exception to enforcing arbitration decisions\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander, Chambers, Johnson, Kulik, Madsen, Owens, Sanders, Stephens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.Tenth Circuit· 2017-06-05· cited 66×
- Yakima County v. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERSCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-05· cited 20×
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 286 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 2013-02-21· cited 20×
- Yakima County v. Yakima County Law Enforcement Officers GuildCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-05· cited 20×
- Paul A. Scholz v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-05-17· cited 14×
- Mainline Rock & Ballast, Inc. v. Barnes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-04-16· cited 10×
- HOUSING AUTHOR. OF CITY OF EVERETT v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-08· cited 9×
- Housing Authority v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-08· cited 7×
- Kitsap County Deputy Sheriffs' Guild v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2015-06-11· cited 5×
- Department of Transportation v. Marine Employees' CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-04-18· cited 3×
- International Union v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-10-17· cited 2×
- City of Seattle v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-03· cited 2×
- City of Seattle Police Department v. City of Seattle Public Safety Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-03· cited 2×
- Washington State Dept. of Transp. v. MecCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-04-18
- Stratford v. AFSCME, Council 15, Local 407Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-12-23
- City Of Seattle, Et Ano. v. Seattle Police Officers' GuildCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-04-05
- International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 23 v. Port of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-02-02
- Serpanok Construction, Inc., V. Point Ruston, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-09-14
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 2,748×
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court· 1983-05-31· cited 1,238×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 973×
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 696×
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 558×
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-02-05· cited 359×
- State v. BennWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 303×
- Stead Motors of Walnut Creek v. Automotive MacHinists Lodge No. 1173, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace WorkersNinth Circuit· 1989-10-06· cited 221×
- Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court· 1974-01-04· cited 149×
- O'HARTIGAN v. Department of PersonnelWashington Supreme Court· 1991-12-26· cited 74×
- Newsday, Inc. v. Long Island Typographical Union, No. 915, Cwa, Afl-CioSecond Circuit· 1990-10-05· cited 68×
- Ex parte CorlissNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1907-10-23· cited 61×
- United States v. Jakeffe HoltSeventh Circuit· 2007-05-15· cited 57×
- City of Boston v. Boston Police Patrolmen's Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-04-04· cited 45×
- Seattle Police Officers' Guild v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1972-03-02· cited 44×
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court· 1995-03-16· cited 39×
- Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 125Washington Supreme Court· 2003-09-11· cited 35×
- Clark County Util. v. Broth. of Elec.Washington Supreme Court· 2003-09-11· cited 34×
Other cases named Kitsap County Deputy Sheriff's Guild v. Kitsap County
8 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Kitsap County Deputy Sheriff's Guild v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-06-26· cited 10×
- Kitsap County Deputy Sheriffs' Guild v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2015-06-11· cited 5×
- KITSAP COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS GUILD v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2008-06-04· cited 4×
- KITSAP COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S GUILD v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-18· cited 2×
- Kitsap County Deputy Sheriff's Guild v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-18· cited 2×
- KITSAP COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S GUILD v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-08
- Kitsap County Deputy Sheriffs' Guild v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2015-06-11
- Kitsap County Deputy Sheriff's Guild v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-06-26
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.