Skip to main content

Kirby v. State

Citations

  • 625 So. 2d 51
  • 1993 WL 365851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the photograph of the crime scene was relevant because it helped to explain and corroborate the victim’s testimony and that it was not so inflammatory so as to create undue prejudice in the minds of the jurors
  • stating that a photograph is admissible if relevant to an issue at trial, either independently or to corroborate other evidence, unless the probative value is outweighed by undue prejudice
  • providing that digital penetration is included in the definition of “sexual battery”
  • where defendant forced victim to insert her fingers into her vagina, court held that finger is \object\ within context of Florida sexual battery statute
  • “It is well established under Florida law that a prosecutor may comment to a jury during closing arguments on the absence of evidence on a particular issue.”
  • examining whether photographs of the crime scene were admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Cope and Goderich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.