District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/21/1993
Kirby v. State
Citations
- 625 So. 2d 51
- 1993 WL 365851
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the photograph of the crime scene was relevant because it helped to explain and corroborate the victim’s testimony and that it was not so inflammatory so as to create undue prejudice in the minds of the jurors
- stating that a photograph is admissible if relevant to an issue at trial, either independently or to corroborate other evidence, unless the probative value is outweighed by undue prejudice
- providing that digital penetration is included in the definition of “sexual battery”
- where defendant forced victim to insert her fingers into her vagina, court held that finger is \object\ within context of Florida sexual battery statute
- “It is well established under Florida law that a prosecutor may comment to a jury during closing arguments on the absence of evidence on a particular issue.”
- examining whether photographs of the crime scene were admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nesbitt, Cope and Goderich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Agatheas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-12-15· cited 23×
- KEELEYBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2017-07-01· cited 7×
- AGATHEAS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-24· cited 4×
- Dorman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-21· cited 4×
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-18· cited 4×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-15· cited 4×
- MacKey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-24· cited 3×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-01· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. PradoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-10-17· cited 2×
- Vasser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-15· cited 1×
- Olivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-16
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-12
- Ana Karen Galdamez v. The State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-07-17
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-01-14· cited 239×
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida· 1984-01-12· cited 147×
- Karchesky v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-16· cited 136×
- Fenelon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-13· cited 93×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-09-27· cited 71×
- State v. KinchenSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 60×
- Leach v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1961-06-16· cited 58×
- Budd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-23· cited 54×
- David v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-03-22· cited 53×
- Garmise v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-08· cited 38×
- Silvestri v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-05-14· cited 34×
- Zamora v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-07-20· cited 28×
- DeBenedictis v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1980-10-06· cited 28×
- Bauldree v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-10-10· cited 25×
- State v. SheperdSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-11-25· cited 24×
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-31· cited 20×
- State v. SilvestriSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-12-16· cited 18×
- Surace v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-08· cited 15×
- Grunzel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.