Kiniry v. Kiniry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “stock options that are awarded prior to the date of dissolution and awarded solely for past services are considered to be earned during the marriage and are, therefore, considered marital property subject to equitable distribution under § 46b-81”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maturo v. Maturo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-04· cited 65×
• Martin v. Martin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-08· cited 13×
• Pagliaro v. Jones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-25· cited 11×
• Kiniry v. Kiniry
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-16· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bornemann v. Bornemann
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-21· cited 111×
• Wendt v. Wendt
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-09-05· cited 62×
• Wendt v. Wendt
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-12-20· cited 44×
• Roach v. Roach
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-01-16· cited 40×
• Schorsch v. Schorsch
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-05-18· cited 25×
• Rolla v. Rolla
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-05-26· cited 21×
• Hopfer v. Hopfer
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-08-22· cited 16×
• Cusano v. Burgundy Chevrolet, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-11-09· cited 11×