King v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence sufficient to find insolvency based on child’s inability to earn an income sufficient to live outside the parent’s home
• finding that the adult child was insolvent based on evidence that he was unable to handle his own money, unable to consistently meet his financial needs without the help of his mother, and not capable of earning an income sufficient to live outside the home
• finding adult child insolvent based on evidence that child could not meet his financial needs without help from his mother, and was not capable of earning an income sufficient to live outside the home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lueckenotte v. Lueckenotte
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2001-01-09· cited 80×
• Sullins v. Knierim
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-03-23· cited 7×
• Bright v. Bright
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-02-24· cited 6×
• Hicks v. Quednow
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-08-01· cited 5×
• Clark v. Clark
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-20· cited 4×
• Braddy v. Braddy
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-11-30· cited 3×
• Keller v. Keller
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-04-25